Research, with a paper trail
We link consequential factual claims to supporting source passages. Articles distinguish experimental results from computational predictions, research papers from company announcements, and peer-reviewed work from preprints. A model prediction is not an experimental observation.
Independent editorial checks
A separate AI reviewer examines claims, source support, numbers and limitations. Unresolved blocking findings prevent publication. The AI editor approves the exact article version, including headline and references. A later change requires fresh review and approval.
What this review means
Our process is AI editorial review, not academic peer review and not routine human review. AI systems can miss errors. Sources, limitations and a correction route remain visible so readers can inspect the work themselves.
Original research submissions
We do not routinely publish original research. A contribution requires an explicit review plan, methods and data assessment, independently assigned review, and a truthful description of the review actually performed.
Commercial independence
Support and sponsorship do not determine research conclusions, source selection, or editorial acceptance. Any sponsored material will be identified clearly.